Advertisements

October 11, 2013

APPSC Material APPSC Group 1 Notification Forum - Group 1 Mains Cancellation Issue - Discussions



APPSC FILES MODIFICATION PETITION IN SC (NEWS DATED: 02/11/2013)


(APPSC Material & Online test Quiz on Indian latest GK and latest current affairs questions 2013, General Knowledge questions and answers  on recent current affairs 2012, Science quiz mpsc, tnpsc, kpsc, current affairs questions and answers, current affairs 2013 quiz, current affairs 2013, 2012 for competitive and bank exams, general knowledge questions 2013 for government jobs in Andhra Pradesh, General Awareness for Bank and All competitive exams, Banking Awareness material with general studies mcq bits practice test. modern history, medieval history, ancient history notes for civil services, Indian Geography notes, APPSC Cutoff marks & Results, banking awareness, Appsc previous papers, general knowledge questions, geography GK, general knowledge quiz, gk quiz, quiz questions, general knowledge questions and answers, gk question, gk questions with answers, general knowledge quiz with answers, World Geography for objective general knowledge, current general knowledge, online general knowledge quiz questions, Indian general knowledge)
APPSC GROUP  1 Material - Useful Links - Full Notes
Andhra Pradesh public service commission (APPSC) Group 1 Mains  Supreme Court Judgement Please continue the discussions of Interview candidates here, after SC Judgement, As previous page 7 forum has reached high number of comments which makes page navigation difficult.
About the Blog: Provides APPSC Material for APPSC Group 1  Notification 2014 and APPSC Group 2 Notification 2014, Appsc upcoming notifications, government jobs in Andhra Pradesh


Advertisements

1,832 comments:

1 – 200 of 1832   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

You dont worry on other party things brother, we shall do the same. Thanks for the free advice

Anonymous said...

you can excel well even in new mains ani anna nee friends ki cheppa, u too can excel well in new prelims and subsequent mains and interview ani. Neeku ee statement varthinchakapothe pattichikoku, varthisthe maakichina advice ye neeku nuvvu anvayinchukoni ok anukunte similar advise maaku ivvudam cheyi.

Anonymous said...

'nee friends ki cheppa" read it as ---nee friends chepparu......

Anonymous said...

Iam not able to understand what exactly you want to tell brother. Is it the following you want to tell

You can also excel well ani mee freinds interviewed candidates tho antunnaru. Daani valla previous messages lo meeru kooda new notification lo prelims, mains and interview excel avvachu ani annamu. Neeku ee statement varthinchakapothe pattinchukoku, varthisthe, makkichina free advices like, u can also do well in new mains etc mee situations ki anvayinchukoni, maaku salahalu ivvadam start cheyandi.

Anonymous said...

ee forum lo debba ki debba padutunnayi. evadu kuda vennaki taggatle.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for correcting me friend. missed candidates musugulo kontha mandhi interviewed candidates meedha comments senseless comments chestunte tattukoleka icha. Andhu valla konni mistakes vachayi total sentence formation lo.

Thanks once again for correcting me

Anonymous said...

Sorry brother, i differ from you. Debbaku debbalu ivvadaniki manam satruvulam kaadhu, both interviewed candidates and missed candidates are at loss because of APPSC.

missed candidates musugulo kondaru antunna matalaku matrame, debbaku debba anna laga matladalsi vastondhi. other wise no body of interviewed candidates is aginst oppurtunity to missed candidates.

Ee vishyanni andharu gamaninchagalaru

Anonymous said...

interview candidates andharu trs vallani mainly harish rao ni contact cheyyali. appude manaki nyayam jaruguddi.

Anonymous said...

Why will harish rao help interview candidates? Interview candidates are from all three regions. Telengana, andhra and rayalseema.

Anonymous said...

Why will harish rao help interview candidates? Interview candidates are from all three regions. Telengana, andhra and rayalseema.

Admn said...

this is all because Previous chairman's head weight. some candidates met her about wrong answers, but she timidly? reject it. now bad result come out.

Anonymous said...

Friends, i just now got information that APPSC counsel in Supreme Court was managed by coaching centers along with few "monetarily sound" candidates who were not able to make it to interview stage, which lead to this kind of verdict.

Is it true?

Admn said...

if appsc knock the SC door again same judgement came out, legal expert view. guys we again need to start our preparation because of appsc blunder mistake.

Anonymous said...

rayalseema and andhra candidates kuda harish rao deggara jai telengana ante mana pani jaruguddi. veelaithe sonia gandhi kuda kaluddam.

Anonymous said...

May be it is true!? No body knows.

But there are chances of what you said is correct.

Let us wait and see whether its true or not.

Anonymous said...

It is as true as the news that interview candidates collected 10 k each to influence the judgment.

Anonymous said...

606 X 10 k, but could not get judgement in their favor.

If so how much more the cost of managing personnel/counsel of APPSC?

Double the 606 X 10K????

Somebody saying its as true as 10k of each interviewed candidate.... must be knowing it!?

Anonymous said...

Yes it may be true.. thats the reason why remains classes were announced long back.

Anonymous said...

How worst society is becoming day by day.

Anonymous said...

who said interviewed have collected 606*10k.Do you have any proof?

Dont post rubbish here.I myself is an interviewed and had not given that much and many of my frnds not a single rupee.
Nyaayam anedhi india lo unte maaku kahchhitamga jarugutumdi.

If my 2 yrs efforts were wasted this tym means I will be a changed one and will commit suicide b4 appsc itself.Atleast then ,they will understand the pain we are undergoing and justice will be done to remaining 605 members.

Anonymous said...

In the same way there is no proof that the money was given by coaching institutes to fight in the courts. Same Coin. Two sides.

Anonymous said...

I too heard that some coaching institutes have started classes using comments of HC bench and its interim order.

I didn't beleived it then. Probably its true.

Really i don't have words to comment if its true.

Anonymous said...

appsc final decision on monday..whether to go for review petition or conduct fresh mains.

Anonymous said...

it's pity that decision is not yet taken.....

Anonymous said...

appsc chairman and staff di bindass jon. pani ..... emi undadu.

Anonymous said...

What's the point in spending so much money if there is a chance for review petition left to APPSC.

If they want to influence, think they need to spend much more than 606*10K?

Anonymous said...

Not much more

Very very much more than 606*10K

Anonymous said...

namaskaram andariki, ma ammayiki ki oka pelli sambandham vacchindi. varudu group on lo select avtharu annaru. court lo case gelusthamu antunnaru.idhi entha varuku nijamu. kastha cheppagalaru.



Anonymous said...

Maa abbayiki kooda oka samandham vachindhi. Pelli november lo ani fix chesamu, kaaboye kodalu last year mains rasindhi, unfortunately not selected to interview. Malli mains jarugutaayi ani supreme court teerpu ichindanta ga. Ammayi tarafu vaallu pelli vayida veyamantunnaru. Yenni rojulu ante matram chepparu.

Paper lo yemo review petition ani antunnaru!

Asalu yemi jaraocho koddiga yevarina cheppagalara!!

Anonymous said...

ikkada jeevitaalu dilemma lo padite meeku pelli vishayalalo clarity kaavaala.............hatavidhee

Anonymous said...

Lol.. Uncles.. Go and ask APPSC fellows.. Coz they know better...and They only can fix marriage date!

Anonymous said...

Maa ammayiki group 1 related sambandhame vachindhi recent ga.

Abbayemo last year prelims lo clear kaaledhu. Kaani maa freinds case vesamu, meme gelustamu kaavalante blog lo discussions chudandi ani ee blog address ichadu.

recent ga paper lo supreme court lo group gurinchi vaarthalu vachyai kadha, daani valla ee blog chusanu. ikkada kooda antha gandaragolanga messages unnayi.

naa doubt yentante asalu aa abbayi prelims clear chestada, yendukante questionlu delete chesaruga, revision kaakunda. Anthe gaka, prelims pass ayina, mains jarugutaya, jarigina kooda malli inkedo case la valla mains cancel avvachuga antunnaru? Poni mains jarigina aa abbayi interview ki vastado rado kooda teliyadu. poni interview varaku vachina job vasthado ledho appaiti chala mandhi antunnattu notification ye cancel avutundemo? assalu teliyatledhu?

Ee sambandham vishyamlo yemi cheyalo artham kavatledhu

Anonymous said...

uncle ji.. u plz go to appsc n ask them fr clarity in this case. n plz let us knw...

Anonymous said...

nenu monna gr-1 mains rasanu..clear kaledu..ippudu malli chance vasthundi antunnaru...chance vachi ee sari clear chesthe naaku America president post isthamantunnaru. so plz clarify :(

Anonymous said...

Abbayi mains clear chestado ledho maku matram ela telustadi?

Anonymous said...

appsc aavaranalo pelli cheyandi. tappakunda group1 ki select aytharu

Anonymous said...

notification: 39/2008 group1 notification also should be cancelled as there are lot of mistakes in mains.

Anonymous said...

Yah, Group 1 even previous to 2008 should also before should also be cancelled along with APPSC conducted other exams like Group 2, ACF, FRO,IPO,AEE etc,which have either wrong answers in key or wrong questions itself.

Then only justice shall be done to all. I wish our beloved friends who filed case on Group 1 should also think in this side, so that justice shall be provided to all. Many of the candidates who have lost those exams because of APPSC, may not be that courageous then you two.

Kindly help them too

That shall end all the problems

Anonymous said...

Ee sari mains lear chesthe American President post isthamante tesuko brother, padivuntundi o pakkaga.

Kaani malli second mains taruvatha yevadina, mains questions lo tappulu unnayani, etc ani casulu vesthe? appudu yenti? Muchataga moodo mains rayali

Kaani appativaraku aa post nee kosame attipedithe ok, leka pothe koddiga kastame

Anonymous said...

when did this blog got turned into astrology or matrimony related site??

Anonymous said...

When justice to all has started.

Anonymous said...

in all probabilities , appsc will lose again in SC. thr r 2 reasons for tht.

1. for any review petition to be successfull , it has to be proved tht new evidence has cropped up after the judgement. in this case , is thr any new evidence ? appsc in all forums (tribunal , HC , SC) failed to counter the argument tht 6 questions were wrong. it doesnt hav any proof. moreover , HC didnt believe in appsc experts committee report at all

2. now its arguing tht only 2 mistakes are thr in the key, not 6.
lets agree to this argument for a minute. so how will they conduct new mains only for 3 candidates ?? Supreme court has rejected this option completely on august 8th. when the candidates can collect such tight evidence tht 6 questions were wrong , whts appsc doing ? it cudnt even counter their arguments. thtswhy when HC ordered for UPSC committee , it was afraid tht its mistakes come into light . so went to SC in hurry and got struck thr.

first this review petition has to be accepted by the court. it depends on the evidence presented by the appsc in the case documents. if thr is no proper evidence , it will reject the petition outright .

they hav only 2 options left now. either cancel the notification or conduct mains again. i believe , they will choose the former and throw the blame on state division.

Anonymous said...

This is rao from karimnagar. My daughters marriage fixed in November. Who will win case? Give complete details.

Anonymous said...

If former option is true, then its also good. Because, there is no hope that there wont be any further cases. So all aspirants rather than waiting 2 or more years once again wont happen.

Coming to justice aspect, " former option" provides justice to wide number of people as it once again provides oppurtunity to around 1.7 lakh candidates once again.

Anonymous said...

need documantary proof of mains case to be won after review.send mail tosivarao.58@gmail.com. be fast as i need to plan wedding

Anonymous said...

illu kaali okadu edustumte chutta velinchukovachha ani adigadamta imkokadu.
APPSC tappula valla jeevitham naasanam ayyi interviewed vaaluu edustume me marriage dicussions emti sir.

Fresh mains will not happen at any circumstances.Either to newly qualified once after revised key or cancellation of notification itsekf.

Those who are thinking abt fresh mains,start your preparation now and wait for result upto 2 more years,then be prepared to hear that mains was cancelled again as court case by some more students who claim that if that 6 qstns were not deleted,we will also be getting chance to write mains.

Anonymous said...

wht is this marriage non-sense here ??? with due respect sir , this is not the right forum for such questions. as the case is in supreme court , everybody is just guessing here . u wont find any documentary proof here.

Anonymous said...

Your right friend. Let these new guys also wait like us to get mains cancelled once again. Then only they can understand what it is to face a pain like this.

Anonymous said...

this forum ee okkarike parimitam kakudadu. ee episode andaru stakeholders. memu lakshalu lakshalu icchi pellilu cheyyali my dear young friends. maku assalu emi jarugutundo telisikovalane hakku undi. vellalo lakshallo coaching fees ,pusthakalu,ma lanti elders kastajitam.nene kadu, chala parents ee discussion lo palguntunnaru. ma views ni accommodate cheyyali. maku unko daari ledu.

Anonymous said...

possibilities
1.appsc file review-
a.release results as they are
b.conduct mains to new candidates
c.mains to allif a..interview students will be happy and missed candidates will continue their prep for new notiifcatio
b.appsc/interviewd candiates can apply for full bench
then if a review petition is squashed interview candidates/appsc has curative petition again same procedure
then they can approach president
b.if appsc conducts mains for new entrants...state bifurcation in the midst so process may nto go smmothly
b.the question paper standards have to maintained on par with 2012 mains...do u think appsc whcih cant prepare a good key for prelims can do this
even by gods grace new entrants give interview..if any of 606 candidates who lost opportunity can feel dat the standars and normalisation of marks was not proper..can file a case
c.re mains for all..also same bifurcation intiates and if some candidates start claiming dat posts for different regions should be separated ...dn also case......!

Anonymous said...

sir, what r the deleted 6 questions by sc ?

Anonymous said...

if bifurcation of state was not dr mains to new entrants was the best option bt not now

Anonymous said...

heard dat the candidate who filed case he himself is loosing cahnce if 6 questions are delted

Anonymous said...

okati konte unkoti free laga, groups preparation tho lawyer course free.

Anonymous said...

Yah, i too heard that candidates who filed case many not be in the list, if it is revised.

Its all because rather to revising key as expected/prayed, deletion of questions took place.

There are chances that they themselves once again file case once results are out and they are not in the list.

Then this notification will find its place in history rather to govt employment records.

Anonymous said...

aithe interview candidates emi cheyyali.

Anonymous said...

Missed candidates laaga casulu vesthu undali

Anonymous said...

appsc emi chesthadi inka?

Anonymous said...

how matches can happen if like this things appsc does. parents are going to sc for justice,

Anonymous said...

how matches can happen if like this things appsc does. parents are going to sc for justice,

Anonymous said...

bros, antha calm ayipoyaru. appsc chairman emi annaru agitation tarvata.manam edhaina cheyyali. calm ga unte chippa vastadi chethiki. unity in diversity ga undali.

Anonymous said...

elections aithe enti, division aithe enti, exams conduct cheyyadaniki ey avrodhalu levu. election code aaa gudda..central goverment state govts ni tokkestundi...state govts aspirants meedha tadaka chupistunnai. manam emo emi peekaleka bhajana chestunnam. Malli cheppukodaniki pedda goppa ga student power ani vaa potham. manaki mundu siggu ledhu.

Anonymous said...

brothers i sahll be in merit list if list is revised but before starting preparation i thought it would be good to seek legal advice and came to chances for interview candidates to win are bright and even if they loose chances for remains and results without cases are low...dnt want towaste my time and energy and most importantly money for coaching institutes...! missed canidates u can agree with me or not this s my opinion based on some facts and rules xpalined to me by a lawyer..if u dnt believe u can carry on with ur wrk.just ignore this

Anonymous said...

avnu saksi sivanand madam kuda ilane chepparu. interview ppl tappaka win avtharu. so mis call candidates meeru chadivina labam ledu. malli meru chadivithe mains lo maku competition ayipotaru.

Anonymous said...

enta mandinin discourage chesthe anta competition taggutadi. civils lo stratagies ikkada vadali. mis cal vallani inka discourage cheyalli.

Anonymous said...

which is best g-1 service. Thanks

Anonymous said...

Guyss,I wrote mains but couldn't qualify.still,I dont want to write fresh mains again as I dont want to my time for 2mnths and keep on waiting for these results for yrs together.Under all probabilities fresh mains and interviews are impossible due to state bifurcation,review petition,interviewed petition, 6qstns deleted case if some candidates didn't qualify for fresh mains due to these 6 qstns deletion,mains qstns of same standard for both mains if mains for newly qualified and standardisation b/n two mains.In the end,after mains and interview if 6 qstns deleted case final hearing came means,then it will cancel the fresh mains and interviews too and left like present interviewed ones.
OH MY GOD,list of cases filed in court goes on....so,my frnds think wisely b4 making ur mind for fresh mains.Its purely my personal opinion.
If you dont like,ignore this post

Anonymous said...

You are right friend, there are many chances that above said cases may come into live over a period of time. Its just some more time needed for it.

Anonymous said...

wisely put my friend.

Anonymous said...

manam emi anukunna, eeni opinions unna, due process of law avtundi.

Anonymous said...

Due process of law option ye appsc follow avutondhi.

Anonymous said...

ataina etaina, chapter close chese time assannam ayindi

Anonymous said...

Ataithd happy ending atleast for 303. Itithe sad ending for all.

Anonymous said...

Aa law ne ma 606 jeevithalni naasanam chesimdhi.
Imka justice anedhi brathiki vunte maaku(intervi3wed) ki tappakumda nyaayam jarugutumdi.

100 mandhi doshulu tappimvhukunna okka nirdoshiki kuda sikdha padakudadu kaani ikkada 606 members ki siksha vesthe em nyaayam jarigimdo vaalla manassakshi ke teliyaali

Anonymous said...

Hopr SC shall consider this point in review petition.

srinath b said...

Today v wil come to know whether appsc is going for review petition or not

Anonymous said...

How do we know about that? Is appsc going to anoounce the same to media?

Anonymous said...

tvaraga edo telcheyandi ra babu..meeku dandam pedtha..

Anonymous said...

Guys, just now got an info:

there is nothing like 606*10K or double 606 * 10K to influence judgements.

It is because of APPSC insider, that deletion of 6 questions took place, rather to revision of 6 or deletion/revision of faulty two as given in some news papers.

This is because, out of all options of revision/deletion of various number of questions in various combinations doesn't lead those petitioners to be in new mains revision list. There is confirmed information that, he colluded with those petitioners.

Heard that there is an inquiry already going on!!

Anonymous said...

all these are steps taken by appsc them self to prolong taking decision and finally shelving the project. lite teesukondi

Anonymous said...

when will we come to know about appsc review petition

Anonymous said...

Day by day one info or other are coming which shows how societal values are fast degrading to get victory. Shame on these guys.

Anonymous said...

Just came to know that sakshi sivanand madam has agreed to mediate between the interview , missed and appsc. they are planning to give the two candidates who filed case, the posts of their choice. so new cases are also coming up.

Anonymous said...

I don't think appsc has itself done it.why would they do that? Some body in appsc might have been bribed by one who needs this verdict.

Anonymous said...

brothers try to get atleast marks display ..... atleast h.no and marks the top 10 marks gainers will solve this case.

Anonymous said...

how will the top ten solve?

Anonymous said...

Marks of all interviewed candidates should me made to public

Anonymous said...

how will that help the case?

Anonymous said...

aa marks chusi ippudu kotha ga mains rase vallu antha akva techkovalo...natha bribes ivvalo calculation ka?

Anonymous said...

rekkalu mukkalu chesukoni, potta madchukoni memu pettina paisalu thinnaru kada mee coaching centers.

Anonymous said...

ippudu kuda boards pettesarata..malli tintaru..re mains ani..

Anonymous said...

brother ple any one tell me what r the 6 deleted questions by sc in 'a' series

Anonymous said...

appsc vallaki pani * * * * * emi undada? rojantha office lo pattu koni kurchuntaru. ikkada manamu vedhavala ayipoyamu.

Anonymous said...

@ anonymous.. u claimed tht mediation between missed candidates , interviewed candi and appsc !!! boss , plz think twice before posting such baseless rumours. how will they get posts now ??? they wud definitely demand RDO posts. now how will they get it ??? in one year , appsc itself will be closed down. who will fulfill their promises ?? think logically before posting such rumours.

Anonymous said...

Some body need to find who is that ***** in appsc who created all this mess.

Anonymous said...

review petition will not be filed by appsc it seems. they are using their constitutional powers and overriding SC verdict,

Anonymous said...

good news frend!

Anonymous said...

good news frend!

Anonymous said...

what is the latest news. are we going to win the review petition in sc?

Anonymous said...

do u know constitution my friend ? appsc has special powers to override SC verdict ??? plz tell me u didnt give gr-1 interview..

SC is the guardian of the constitution. whn it gives a judgement , even upsc has to obey. appsc is just a state commission. it must obey the judgement or go n file a review petition.

i believe today is govt holiday. appsc is not working. so tomorrow will be final decision by appsc. mostly they will file the petition.

Anonymous said...

606*10k blah blah stop this bullshit.Even in interviewed there are amny unemployed and poor who haven't single rupee...bribing judges etc how can you say that.Now ,judgement is in favour of prelims not qualified that means who bribed whom.Ask yourself,but,I dont want to make such comments as I know that without basis,we cannot spread rumours.

kota stalin said...

Friends never think like that. We are going to win our case. Prelims qualify kani vari gurinchi time waste.
We are 606 out of state.
Don't worry good luck

kota stalin said...

If coaching centers not involved......
J.Sudheer advocate at tribunal will came to supreme court?

Anonymous said...

missed ppl are the real heroes. aaru nnoraina maname gelusttam friends. sc is justice

kota stalin said...

For your doubt my answers
1.APSPSC Constitutional body! With out experts committee report how can a judge decide the answers right or wrong?
In 16000 mains qualified candidates 7000 candidates are absent.
How can the judge give second chance to absentees?
It is against to natural justice.
2.APSPSC independent body and have powers to give marks for wrong question or cut the marks. But supreme court doing APSPSC duties!
SC only advise to any constitutional body. It give judgment when APSPSC works against to constitution

Anonymous said...

Correct ye friends. Missed candidates are real winners and should be the only winners. Not others. Thats what we all want.

Anonymous said...

@stalin bhai.. we knw tht appsc is a constitutional body. but is it working like one ?? its behaving like a govt dept.

for ur info, HC ordered appsc to go to UPSC and get the report. but appsc went to SC to avoid upsc report coz it knws tht once UPSC certifies tht those 6 questions are wrong, then no court can save appsc. thtswhy it ran to SC and struck thr. SC gave many orders in other technical fields like telecom licensing. so u mean to say tht the honourable court does not hav expertise ??

its not giving 2nd chance to those 7000 candidates. its giving chance to those who missed mains bcoz of faulty key. with the right key , some of those 606 may be out. so an undeserving candidate is getting a job thr. is tht justice for u ?

SC can "ORDER" any other body . whether u take it as ADVISE or ORDER it doesnt matter. appsc has to follow tht advise.

u r right in saying tht appsc has power to give marks to any question . but if they keep on doing mistakes , cant we approach court to get justice ? SC has given justice in this case and hope to affirm it again in review petition if filed.

Anonymous said...

How can you say SC had done justice as it had done injustice to 606 candidates.

Anonymous said...

Whats problem to you guys if sc orders mains to new candidstes only rather to all incase of a review petition is accepted. Any ways candidates who deserve chance only be given that rather to others who have already utilized it. In the telecom case you have reffered SC chided govt on lapses in its procedure but they have not repriminded appsc and its functioning., based on this comparision can we assume that appsc in its functioning? Not even the so called poineers of justice compalined on
working of appsc and reforms needed. It was very good platform to correct the functoning of appsc infact any other PSC.

What is the need of the hour is nobody should loose oppurtunity for the mistakes not done by them. Missed candidates problems are addressed. Let others who feel aggrieved should also be allowed to do have same.

Anonymous said...

There will always be two sides to a case. Each will make a harangue about the self righteousness of their respective position. Finally,as a step of last resort, some authority of the land will make the final call. So what is the essence. Everybody is right in their own way.

Anonymous said...

i dont hav any prob if sc orders re-mains for new candidates only , my friend. but whn SC itself told fresh mains is the only solution , i am arguing for tht . besides thr r probs of normalisation etc , which were considered by SC .

i differ with u abt interviewed candidates position. true tht they hav not committed any mistakes. but they hav to bear the burden bcoz of appsc mistakes just like missed candidates did. wht mistake we hav committed ??? we r also scapegoats like u .

so either re-mains for new or fresh mains for all is the only solution. since SC told fresh mains , i am for tht. i dont mind competing with all 16000 or only some aspirants. big thing is i get a chance to write mains.

Anonymous said...

This line in the previous comment aptly summarizes the situation.

" true tht they hav not committed any mistakes. but they hav to bear the burden bcoz of appsc mistakes just like missed candidates did. "

Anonymous said...

Can anyone elaborate why SC did not hang on to the idea of 2 mains?

Anonymous said...


" true tht they hav not committed any mistakes. but they hav to bear the burden bcoz of appsc mistakes just like missed candidates did. "

If SC had done justice to missed candidates by its judgement,then hope that the same SC will do justice to interviewed ones also.It may take some time but JUSTICE TO BE DONE TO MISSED CANDIDATES AND INTERVIEWED ONES ALSO,iF AT ALL JUSTICE PREVAILS IN INDIA

Anonymous said...

malli naovember lo meins. ippude telsindi.

balu said...

then prepare well mydear friend....hope u will be the topper i that mains....hehe

babu said...

hi friends...i consulted a senior lawyer in delhi and discussed about our case in detail...he suggested two options for us...they are
1).The only course left to those who wrote for mains and were interviewed is to approach APEX court for another direction caring their hardship for no fault of their own.The point needs equitable consideration.
2).Those who wrote for mains and were interviewed were not party at any stage,not even before the Supreme court, APPSC was required to raise this point right from Tribunal stage,or from writ stage,but it failed.The order of Supreme court has come without hearing to those who would be actual sufferers which is not the principle of justice and hence they have right to file an independant case before supreme court making
all original petitioners at High Court and APPSC as respondent to their petition.

Anonymous said...

ya topperlu meru..jokerlu ma 606 ..ade ga mee uddesham..chadvandi cahdvandi...baga.chadvi...300 members kothaga vastharu ga....mothma 300 posts meeke...

Anonymous said...

Ye november lo friend?

Anonymous said...

ha ha very good question ye nvoember anta..coaching institutes ni adgi cheppandi,,,crash course,instant mains course appudu finish ithe appudu pedthara

Anonymous said...

antey picholla laga interview daka vachi malli mains rasthama..memu.meku mee coaching institutes ki memantha bunch of jokers la kanipisthunnama

Anonymous said...

thr wont be any mains in november ..coaching institutes might be spreading this rumour for making money.

mostly appsc will go for review petition.even if they dont win thr , they might cancel the notification. i dont think appsc will dare to conduct mains again in this situation.

Anonymous said...

brother ,an advocate suggested u approch again court,wow what a gdnws bro,remember they are advocates, dont lose time ,ask appsc wht to do ,wht there plan,either result or exam.that is the strait way.dont spnd time .

Anonymous said...

You accept that both are at loss because of appsc mistake. But we only need to bear the burden of appsc mistake. Why dont you people do the same and with draw petition and file a case for revoke of judgement. Salahalu iche mundhu patinchi ivvali

Anonymous said...

we srongly demanding for TELANGANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.DIVISON OF POSTS IS NEEDED.TELANGANA BIDDALANI MUNCHINA APPSC TO TELANGANA LO RECRTMNT VADDU.

Anonymous said...

transparency leni APPSC cheta form avutunna TELANGANA lo recrtmnt jarugute .anta injustice tappa veremi vundadu babu.anta seemandrake.

Anonymous said...

who said only interviewed r bearing the burden ?? wht abt missed candidates ?? if correct key was given , some of u wud not hav written mains. and some of us wud hav been among 606. why shud we allow this injustice happen ??? just because u were interviewed , shud we show sympathy ???

remember all hav equal rights over the posts. thru faulty key , many of us lost the chance. we need a fair chance now.

@telangana bhai. i am also from telangana.will the new commission be honest ?? in this emotional times , no one cares if posts will be sold in market. i dont care abt state division just like any aspirant. i just want an honest service commission which i dont see in the new state. but these things r out of my hand.lets see wht happens...

Anonymous said...

you have brought a practical point. In these emotional times,nobody will care about mal-practices going in the background.

Anonymous said...

gm young frends,

what is the latest news.give good news. interview candidates winning.
Siva Rao Uncle

Anonymous said...

there must be an CB CID enquiry on
the issue of hand in glove job of
insiders, otherwise these black sheep will help in Mains to their
friends.

Anonymous said...

Let us demand enquiry on this issue
for transparency

Anonymous said...

interview candidates andaraki rdo post ivvali. ivvakapothe telengana lo mla seat reserve cheyyali. jai telengana. seemaandra kukkalni get out cheyyali.

Anonymous said...

Good job in order To divert & dilute enquiry on the role of insiders

Anonymous said...

upsc lo telengana students ki reservation ivvali. JAI TELENGANA ANI CHEPPANDI brothers. Jai telengana ante udhyogalu vastayi.

Anonymous said...

jithulumaarina **** ,why are u
afraid of enquiry ? kukkalu viswasaniki pratheekalu , they help
to catch thieves,criminals.
stop u r efforts to divert
the topic , demand on the enquiry

Anonymous said...

Dear Diverter join in active politics for bright future,
yekadikoo Well ipotavu

Anonymous said...

Aa panedho nuvvu chesi yekkadiko vellipo, yelagu kotta mains jarige paristhti ledhu kabattininnu chusi inspire ayyi aaa yekkadiko ki memu kooda chrradaniki bayalu deratam.

Anonymous said...

Diverter come up with novel ideas to divert from enquiry

Anonymous said...

Diverter come up with new , new,

ideas , old are not working.

Anonymous said...

Dear non diverter/anti diverter, kindly come out novel ideas of how to bribe insiders for the larger good to all concerned parties. Kindly discuss the same with flag bearers of justice, who bribed appsc personnel and convey those novel idesd to us also!!!!

Anonymous said...

Enquiry vestha anni baitaku vasthai

Anonymous said...

no inside job. all done by interview to deny justice to real heroes.

Anonymous said...

Enquiry vesthe telusthundhi, yevaru yenthaga digajararo gelavadam kosam

Ilanti valla valle vyavastha meedha unna aa kastha nammakam kooda potondhi.

Anonymous said...

earlier also on oct6th some one commented here that telangana interviewers need not write fresh mains as harish rao talked to judge etc but other interviewers have to write.What happened in this issue.nothing is done.stop your rumours and divide and rule strategies.Here,irrespective of regions every is suffering that your separating minds dont understand.

Anonymous said...

did harish rao talk to judge?

Anonymous said...

pisikithe gani paithyam kudaradu..laga, ma interview candidates badha ardam cheyyandi, case withdraw ceyyandi.

Anonymous said...

Secretary madam is an IPS officer she will take care of the enquiry
on the insiders role . then every
thing will be changed.

Anonymous said...

enti pisikedi? what is the meaning of that. ardam pardam leni comments cheyyakandi.

Anonymous said...

na mogude unte, mangalodu enduku...laga undi friends ikkada. Siva rao uncle

Anonymous said...

Yah, as a secratary of appsc and also as an IPS officer she may be having lott of sources to find out who is the real culprit of appsc personnel, whotook bribe and helped self proclaimed flag bearers of justice.

Hope that enquiry is done soon and guilty be punished severly.

Anonymous said...

ask appsc to disclose atleast marks .....try...try...try to convince apex court.then if is the solution fr this case

Anonymous said...

Mogudu, mangalodu sangathi teliyadu kaani, inti dongalu matram unnaru. Valla valle nijanga nyam jaragalsina missed candidates ki anayam jariginidhi.

Aa inquiry edho tondara jarigi vaallku siksha padithe konthalo kontha sama nyam jarugutundhi

Anonymous said...

yeh telangana bhai..u r right..lets ask for reservation for PM post to telanganite. full rights to u to choose the candidate..

i am also from telangana. just tell me in one sentence how state division will benefit u personally ??? kotha state vasthe manchide if it results in more posts from appsc. but tht wont happen . even if notifications are given , they will be sold. u and me both will be losers.

this appsc is honest and lets hope atleast they finish this notification before state is divided.

Anonymous said...

Ee notification saafiga mugiyalante aa inti donga/ dongalni along with outsiders pattukoni sikshinchadam jaragali.

Adi jarigaka antha saafiga andariki nyam jarugutundhi.

Anonymous said...

i dont understand whts this insider issue ??? can someone plz explain

this issue is related to wrong key , which was due to prev chairperson and sec'y. that means its due to appsc itself. not just one 'insider'. if u r talking abt the so-called professors who prepared the key , then he cant be called as insider. whn mistakes were pointed by us , appsc didnt agree. so main culprit is appsc only , not just one person.

so whr is this insider issue now ??? its unnecessary diversion..

Anonymous said...

interview friends monna aa insider sangathi secretary mam mundu mana frnd okadu athani yedurugane cheppadu....appreciate his courage and now mam said she and chairman will only takecare of this case

Anonymous said...

Its not diversion friend. Its a fact which came later. In this particular case "insider" is the one who helped so called flag bearers of justice, so that they are in the new list.

Anonymous said...

when appsc is going to file review ppetition.Interviewed ones pls keep keep hope that justice will be done to us also like justice did to missed candidates.

Supreme court is there to do justice but not to do injustice to interviewed ones.

Anonymous said...

aa insider aa outsiders andarni shishinchali bhayya mana 606 members ni intha badhapettina valla nu vadiledi ledu

Anonymous said...

aha,emi vichitram APPSC HONEST ....A,BRO,A LOKAM LO UNNAU,POLITECH LECRER SCAM GURTULEDA,MEMBER JAIL KU ENDUKU VELLINATLO,ANTE EMANNA MONEY PETTI INTERVIEW VACHHINAVA BRO ,FIRST OF PREPARE FOR FRESH MAINS .IF UR REALLY TALENTED DON T BOTHER ABOUT THIS EXAM,LAST MAINS WAS CONDUCTED ON WRONG METHOD ON THE BASIS OF WRONG KEY.U PEOPLE AS A TALENTED SHOULD NOT WORRY ABOUT FRESH EXAM.RANODU RANE RADU VACCHINAVANI KI EKKADA PETTINA VASTUNDI

Anonymous said...

BRO NEE LAAGA APPSC PERSONNEL KI DABBULU ICHI CSE LO TANAKU( ANAGA NEEKU) ANUKULANGA VACHELA CHESUKONE BAPATHU KAADHU MEMU. APPSC MISTAKES NI YEVADU POGADALA, APPSC CHETAKANI TANANNI NEE LANTI VALLU DABULICHI COURT CASULALO KOODA ANUKULANGA MARCHUKOVADANNI AAPAMANI CHEBUTUNNAMU.

naaku talent undhi kabatte interview varaku vella, previous mains lo kooda vella. Neelaga prelims miss ayyi, kotta list kooda konni questions delete chesthe ranu ane information dabbulichi kanukkoni, yemi chesthe nenu malli mains ki ravacho anukune bapathu kaadhi naadhi.

Anonymous said...

badapadake anna nuvve raboye TELANGANA LO RDO ITAVU TIYE .NEE PISALU EVVALAKU ECHHINAVO VALLADAGGARIKI POYE ADUKKO.FREE T LO JOBS VASTAYI. TONDARAPADI DABBULICHHI EDI CANCEL ANAGANAE BAYAPADAK.NEE CHADUVU NINNU KAPADUTADI

Anonymous said...

RANODU RANE RADU VACCHINAVANI KI EKKADA PETTINA VASTUNDI

yekkada pettina yeppudu pettina vastundhi annappudu maaku(already raasina vallaku) pettadam yenduku?

Daani gurinche ee discussion antha!!

Anonymous said...

ante tondi ga dobbi potava .tappu jarigininapudu nakendi ani .naaku enta labam anukuni. mains rasi.nenu gelichanu antava.ippudu kadu bro ,e katha prati g 1 jarugutunnadi.ee sari chakkabadite next neeku ravachhu.leda dongala palu kaka tappadu

Anonymous said...

nee laaga dabbulu ivvaledhu dobbi povadaniki.

mains clear chesi interview povadam gelipu ani neelanti mean minded lanti vallaku anipinchachu, naaku adoka stage datellanu ani matram anukunta.

prati g1 lo jaride ayyinappudu nuvvemi peekutunnavu, ippudu yedo case telaledhu kabatti dabbulichi malli mains jaruguthe raaddam anukuntunnavu anthe ga!

Anonymous said...

appsc is planning for review petition on 17th ,TV5 scrolling..
any news on dat..

edaina twarag telethey bavundunu..lekapothey elaney timepass chesi notification cancel antaru..

e case vesina vallu nijanga emaina laba paddaro ledho..
deenikantey kotta notification meedha concentrate chesthey bavundedhi andariki use ayyedhi...

Anonymous said...

kotha notification kosam manam em cheyyagalam bhayya ??? its not in our control. main culprit for tht is state division decision. we cant do anything abt tht..

new notifications only whn thr is some clarity abt state division.

Anonymous said...

ignore those people boss mana interview candidates andaru must keep an eye on appsc moves...17 ki review file chesinappatinundi mana favour lo judgement vachedaka maname responsibility teeskovali...by all possible means

srinath b said...

No scrolling ... where did you get that information regarding appsc filing reveiw petition

Anonymous said...

Is it true that scrolling has come

Anonymous said...

yes interviewers.mana nyaaya m kosam maname poraadudam.evaru meeda aadharapadoddhu.

Imka APPSC emaina chesiddi ani konthamandhi nidra potunnaru,meeu jarigina anyaayaaniki meere poraadakapothe repu gr 1 officers ayi evariki sahayapadagaluguthaaru?

Ippudaina nidra levamdi.Supreme court ilanti JUDGEMENT THO MAAKU ANYAAYAM CHESE BADULU VURI SIKSHA VESUMDALSIMDHI MAAKU.Ippudemi anthakante takkuva baadhanu ivvaledu maaku.

Anonymous said...

dont worry...appsc will again fail in SC. and it will conduct mains soon. no other option.

kota stalin said...

You are all deviating from subject.
1.those who have completed mains should write mains again? Is this natural justice?
2.if state separated APSPSC is common for 10 years for both States. (As per cabinet note)

kota stalin said...

Thank you for your response friend.
Supreme court can not gave judgment without experts report in telecom license case!
It depending on CAG Values!
If you agree or not SC judgment is wrong, coz without experts report

kota stalin said...

Brother you are correct!!!!!! You are correct for jyothishyam

Anonymous said...

now suddenly evrybody is qualified to talk abt Supreme court. before judgement , they were talking and writing essays here abt re-mains to new candidates only. whn the supreme court itself told appsc not to conduct 2 mains for one exam , still they argue for 2nd mains for few persons.

it is appsc who has bypassed expert committee report. candidates did not move SC. it is appsc tht knocked the doors of SC .it shud hav waited for UPSC report. why didnt it wait ?? now it is arguing only 2 questions were wrong !! how silly is tht. maximum wht can happen is SC may order for UPSC committee again.

u cant expect possitive judgement just because of sympathy factor. if thts the case , whn lalu cried in court, he shud hav been released. ofcourse , here interviewed candidates are also scapegoats bcoz of appsc mistakes. they r not the culprits.

can someone tell me how to ensure justice to missed candidates ??? plz dont raise re-mains for new only. SC already forbid tht. and plz dont say tht we hav gud chances in new notifications and withdraw the case .

ishwar said...

when did supreme court commented on 2 mains bro...neeto emmanna personal ga cheppinda...maaku telidu...now a days even ssc tier 2, bank exams are being conducted with 2 or more different papers in alternate sundays....even civils lo kuda different optionals tho common merit tistunnaru kada....and more over others also as qualified as like u to comment...dont u know the right to express is one of our FR

kota stalin said...

Bro we r not going to SC on sympathetic way. Our fight is for natural justice! if 6 questions r deleted some new people selected for mains. They are eligible for fresh mains, but not interviewers!
What is the interviewers mistakes?
SC not forbidden the interviewers, but forgotten!!!!!
We giving just reminder to SC..... with review.
And one more thing we r not against to freshers!
We asking for mains only freshers! and it is your wish also........

Anonymous said...

oh interview varaku vellamu ani peddaga anyayam jarigindi ani badapadakandi.asalu me papers bayata pedite anta pratibhavantulo telustundi ,appsc vallu e pani chesi mee prathiba nu lokani chati .meeku g 1 lo job enduku evvarado plebicite pettali

Anonymous said...

People say interviewed candidates are al scape goats, then whats the solution for problem of interviewed candidates. Please dont start the same rheotic of you can qualify this time also, if you write mains onemore time also....blah blah.

Can any body give solution to this?

Anonymous said...

only fresh mains will give the ans

Anonymous said...

PAPER-4 QUESTIONS FROM 1 ENGLISH BOOK IN MAINS... Anyone foundthis.. thi is truly conspiracy , some candiates might have that information and easily got through mains

Anonymous said...

Meeru appsc personnel ki lanchalu icho leka vere yeralu veso proper data bench ki vellakunda addukunna vishyam appsc ki already telusu. Aa vishyam meedha enquiry vesi taruvatha plebisite pedithe telustundhi mimmalni asalu gr 1 lanti exams ki allow cheyalo ledho telusthundhi

Anonymous said...

brother , first tell me whts the problem of interviewed candidates . they r heart-broken that mains is cancelled after coming to this stage. at such last stage , how cud they cancel mains right ? this is ur grievance right ? kindly correct me if i am wrong.

while attending interview , appsc must hav told u tht results r subject to the judgement of court. now judgement came and unfortunately it came against u . so technically , u dont hav any problem. but on humane grounds , yes its a big problem.

in such cases , political support will be thr , but not judicial support.

@ishwar. plz refer august 8th order . on tht day SC advised appsc not to think of 2 mains.appsc has raised this issue on tht day but judge didnt agree.

we cant compare appsc mains with bank exams and SSC. coz they r objective and easy to normalise. yes , normalisation can be done in subjective also like UPSC. but upsc conducts only one mains which has different subjects. here u r talking abt 2 mains. thr is a previous judgement by SC tht u cant conduct 2 mains . if SC strikes down tht previous judgement with appsc case , well and gud. otherwise , evryone has to obey SC judgement.


Anonymous said...

Nee lanti vaallu subject chadavakunda ye questions ye guide lo unayyi, ye coaching centre material lo unnayo chusthu kurchunte anthe avutundhi.

Anonymous said...

ikkada avariki interview candidates ni am ane rights levu..chepthunna..ina meku mains november lo ,positng december lo antunnaru ga mee appsc insiders,coaching centres mari ikkada nduku time waste chesthunnaru....ma pratibha nto chudala....sare mains papers kadu kani malli SC verdict vastahdi kada..appudu tlsuthadi... 6 qstions delete chesthe vache meeke intha unte....memela kanipisthunnamo meku..me pogaru antha avarni chuskuno..valani debba teeyali intervie frnds...aa tarvata vellaki tlsuthadi

Anonymous said...

what is your problem with interviewed candidates going to SC.

Who said anybody is not obeying its orders, we are following its order. There is an option for it in judgement copy itself. Kindly look at the last point.

Anonymous said...

ikkada em conspiracy undo artham kavatledu. missed candidates court ki velli judgement techukunnaru. they didnt lobby with dirty politicians. mains qualify ayyavante u hav some stuff. dont degrade urself by such comments. ignore tht plebscite comment.no need to reply to such mindless comments bhai. missed candidates venaka evarunnaru anukuntunnav ?? coaching centres aa ??? proof unte cheppu bhai. aina money support chesinantha maathraana judgement wrong ante ela ??? appsc has more financial resources than candidates. they shud hav hired a better lawyer. but still they lost.

Anonymous said...

Friend, the same SC has different opinions on same topic at different times. Refer paper 2 section 3 topics of gr 1. It all happens based on situation and info available to SC at that time. In this case also, there was lapse in passage of some info to SC grom appsc because of conspiracy from an insider who worked like hand in glove with some of your friends. Finally this is the situation.

Anonymous said...

So simarly sc based on material evidence, may change its verdict whichmight give justice to both aggreived parties i.e. Missed and interviewed. What we expect is that

Anonymous said...

PAPER-4 QUESTIONS FROM 1 ENGLISH BOOK IN MAINS... Anyone foundthis.. thi is truly conspiracy , some candiates might have that information and easily got through mains


PLEASE COMMENT

Anonymous said...

i am sorry..did u just say appsc lawyer conspired with missed candidates to cancel the exam ??? coz he is the only channel for flow of information from appsc to supreme court.

Anonymous said...

Your friends might know who exactly it is in appsc.

Anonymous said...

yeh i know exactly who it is.i cant tell u his name. but i will give a clue. he works as security guard in appsc. and he wears uniform too.he conspired with missed candidates and influenced SC judgement.

go n find him tomorrow and take media also along with u . u will be the star in channels tomorrow. i wont be surprised if u get Bravery award for next republic day :)

Anonymous said...

You r right friend. You solved one of the rarest puzzle, which we were not able to crack. When media calls i shall inform them its all because of you we could know his insider. If they nominate me for bravery award, i shall definetly do the same info dissemination once again. So that the world know about your brain which can crack tough cases. Probably they shall nominate you to directly ci cheif. They need brains likr u to let off all the left over culprits.

Keep it up my friend.

Anonymous said...

security guard tho compare cheyakandi plss aa insider ni..guard kuda kukka laga vishwasam ga untadu.....aa INSIDER kukka tho kuda compare cheygalama?

Anonymous said...

everyone wants a punching bag for their failures. looks like appsc created an insider rumour to escape from the fury of candidates. keep punching it guys...

Anonymous said...

straight questions(1) why re mains for only new candidates is opposed?
(2)why opportunity has to be given again for candidates who were absent voluntarily( 7000), who failed(8394) in mains exam conducted last year 2012 in the name of re mains for all?

Anonymous said...

After this mains some candidates who failed again demands for re mains on many genuine grounds like
paper leaked, question given from a
book, translation problems, valuation problems, some questions are not in tune with prescribed syllabus ,question papers are given early in some exam centres, in some exam centres answer booklets are not taken in time etc ,etc, again re mains for all?

Anonymous said...

Problem in prelims / screening test
Re mains for all, then problem in mains itself so again re mains for all, super , mind blowing,

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 1832   Newer› Newest»

Followers